2011 | Learn Cyber Security

Subscribe & Don,t Miss A Free Hacking Course| Receive Daily Updates

Enter your email address:

Bypass Intrusion Detection/Prevention Signatures



*Please note that this does not include the multitude of configuration errors (disabled by default checks like POST search/bad preprocessor configurations like minimum fragment length) nor network vs. host-based issues like fragment reassembly.
For configuration errors by default, please check http://cvs.snort.org....cgi/snort/doc/ and read appropriate preproc documents for disabled checks. By host, please check snort.conf. By network vs. host based issues, please google ids evasion.*

Today we're going to be taking a look at Snort signatures that are pushed by the public (amateur/community) and by professional signature writers. This paper will take a look at how to bypass these signatures once we have access to them and prove that modern signatures are as useful as modern antivirus engines. In particular, Snort signatures will be looked at as it is likely the most popular ids/ips solution and a lot of its content is made publicly available. We will start off with the mentality of signature writers and the mistakes they usually make. While this focuses on Snort, consider other IDS/IPS solutions and how these techniques may benefit you in other secured environments.



### Amateur/Average User Signatures ###

First off, before any kind of details against specific signature arguments are seen, let's get generic. People writing signatures are typically on a timeline. Also, people writing these signatures aren't necessarily vulnerability researchers and may not even understand the vulnerability or bug being presented to them. Because of this, it should be obvious that your attack should deviate from the public exploit as much as possible. Sometimes there are community exploit detections that are released just to say you have a signature so some company can keep feeling secure (happens ALL the time) against the skiddles. Look at the recent overlapping ranges DoS attack on Apache for a perfect example. When the new technique for this bug came out everyone was scampering for rules to appeas corporations and/or the public. So some of the newest content that comes out will likely be pushed to production in haste.

On to the bug itself, the overlapping ranges attack is rather humerous. The attack pattern is something like:

Range: bytes=0-,0-20,1-20,2-20,3-20...

These ranges can be added any number of times and will generate a new request in memory for every range requested. Any range that is unhandled will request all bytes until end of file. So 0- is 0-EOF. The server code handling these ranges is not very optimized, so hundreds of requests can be made causing high memory utilization. Sending hundreds of packets for hundreds of range requests that is not optmially handled will result in memory starvation rather quickly.

Here is the initial signature discussion on full disclosure:
http://seclists.org/...re/2011/Aug/289

1.) alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> any 80 (msg:"INBOUND Apache Killer script: Local web server is under attack."; content:"Range:bytes=0-"; classtype: denial-of-service; threshold: type threshold, track by_src, count 5 , seconds 20; sid:3000005;)

2.) alert tcp any any -> any $HTTP_PORTS (content:"Range"; nocase; http_header; pcre:"/(\d\,){6,}/xH"; http_header; msg:"Apache DOShttp://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Aug/175"; reference:cve,2011-3192 )

3.) pcre: "/^Range:bytes\s+\d+-\d?,\d+-\d+,\d+-\d+,\d+-\d+,\d+-\d+,\d+-\d+,/xH"; http_header;

The first signature is very easy to bypass. This was made for the public exploit and specifying a number other than 0- will allow you to bypass the signature. Not only that, but nocase was never specified. This would mean that ByTes would bypass this signature. Also, spacing between the header and argument is going to invalidate the signature. Spacing is actually a huge menace to signatures trying to be specific for optimization reasons, more on this in later sections.
The second signature would actually not work on any exploit attempt for this bug. The pcre does not check for a dash, only a character followed by a comma six sequential times. As no consideration for the dash is in there, this would never fire. I'm glad this was seen because people do push signatures out to the public that do not work on the exploit in question.
The third signature is more interesting to us in a bypass sense. The regex looks for any amount of digits followed by a dash and any amount of digits. /xH stands for ignore whitespace characters (in the regex expression) and H is specific to Snort PCRE. In the Snort manual H is specified as:

"Match normalized HTTP request or HTTP response header (Similar to http header). This modifier is not allowed with the unnormalized HTTP request or HTTP response header modifier(D) for the same content. For SIP message, match SIP header for request or response (Similar to sip header)."

What normalize does not do is be case insensitive (/i). So mixing case values will invalidate this signature and effectively allow you to bypass it.

**Don't give the guy on the list shit, he gave out free information and made a valiant attempt at detection. That's more than I can say for a lot of people.



### Community/Official Signatures ###

Alright, let's step up our targets and stop picking on amateur/novice writer signatures. Let's take a look at the emerging threats community signatures. A very popular choice for free signatures. Most companies will sign up for these signatures and place them in their environment as is. Also, sometimes people who write their own signatures will see that one is already created for it and not even bother to validate or write their own. These emerging threats community rules are freely distributed at:

http://rules.emergingthreats.net/

We'll take a look at the same vulnerability. There are two rules in emerging threats related to this attack:

1.) alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"ET SCAN Kingcope KillApache.pl Apache mod_deflate DoS attempt"; flow:established,to_server; content:"Range|3a|bytes=0-,5-0,5-1,5-2,5-3,5-4,5-5,5-6,5-7,5-8,5-9,5-10,5-11,5-12,5-13,5-14"; http_header; fast_pattern:only; classtype:attempted-dos; reference:url,seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Aug/175; sid:2013472; rev:2;)

2.) alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"ET SCAN Apache mod_deflate DoS via many multiple byte Range values"; flow:established,to_server; content:"Range|3a|"; nocase; http_header; content:"bytes="; http_header; fast_pattern; nocase; distance:0; isdataat:10,relative; content:","; http_header; within:11; isdataat:10,relative; content:","; http_header; within:11; isdataat:10,relative; content:","; http_header; within:11; isdataat:70,relative; content:!"|0d 0a|"; within:12; pcre:"/Range\x3a\s?bytes=[-0-9,\x20]{100,}/iH"; classtype:attempted-dos; reference:url,seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Aug/175; sid:2013473; rev:1;)

The first one is obviously checking for the public exploit. Not only is it doing that, but it's even more specific (thus worse) to the public exploit than the amateur rule. This just goes to show that just because a rule may be in an 'official' release doesn't mean it's really all that good.
The second one is much more involved to the attack and is close to a hardened detection. There's a lot of junk to look at, but most of the signature is really only used for optimization before it hits the pcre engine as pcre is an expensive luxury to a sensor. The main meat of the signature is "pcre:"/Range\x3a\s?bytes=[-0-9,\x20]{100,}/iH";". /iH means normalize the url and do not worry about case sensitivity. The problem is normalization doesn't remove extra whitespace characters. While we look for valid whitespace in certain areas (between range/bytes and in the range itself), the signature does not check between bytes and the specified ranges. Also, note the valid attempt at checking for a space between Range: and bytes only checks for one whitespace character (\s?). So, to invalidate the regex, simply use "bytes = range-values".



### Professional Signatures ###

How about those companies with the budget for good signatures? Professional signatures usually have very good expressions because the authors work with them all the time. A good idea of professional signature quality lies in SourceFire's own VRT team:

http://www.snort.org/start/rules

New rules are released often and you can get them for free after the initial 30 days of release. This is a great service as it is current and the rules are usually decent. Of course, the rules have problems just like everyone else. Unfortunately, I can't give away any information on VRT rules that aren't past the 30 day mark. The example signature I want to use is in this 30 day, so I can't show their signature. Instead, let's consider a proof of concept attack for my made up protocol:

retrieve /happygoat
argument:nomnom=nom-mem.nom-mem.nom-mem.nom-mem.nom-mem.nom-mem
from pacmanfever.com

Now, let's say a professional pcre would look like:
pcre:"/^argument\x3anomnom=([\w\x20\x2D]+\x2e){4,}/Hsmi";

This would effectively check for the public attack. The regex grouping would catch our nom-nom attack appropriately. /Hsmi is case insensitive, allow . in expression to include a new line, treat string as line of characters, and normalize the url. However, none of these arguments strip or allow for excess whitespace. So, by placing a space between argument and \x31, \x3a and nomnom, or nomnom and =, then we would effectively bypass this signature.
These regex expressions are usually very detailed when it comes to the attack, however there is a lack of detail for variations in the legitimate portion of how it's called.



### depth ###

Now, to get away from rule writers and on to snort specifics. The problems usually lie when the writer wants to optimize their rules so it's not so taxing on snort to validate. A major problem lies in depth. According to the snort manual, depth is:

"The depth keyword allows the rule writer to specify how far into a packet Snort should search for the specified pattern. depth modifies the previous ‘content’ keyword in the rule.
A depth of 5 would tell Snort to only look for the specified pattern within the first 5 bytes of the payload."

I went ahead and just picked a random rule for an example. Here's a good one:

alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET 3057 (msg:"WEB-MISC Borland StarTeam Multicast Service buffer overflow attempt"; flow:established,to_server; content:"GET AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"; depth:25; reference:bugtraq,28602; reference:cve,2008-0311; classtype:attempted-admin; sid:16283; tag:session,5,packets; rev:1;)

There are two interesting bypasses here to look at. The first is with the attempted content match. Depth is stating that the content match must be found within the 25 bytes from offset 0 into the payload (which the author misjudged as the start of the command). However, if something could be inserted into the payload before GET, while causing no problems to the injection itself, then it would bypass the depth limit and invalidate the signature.
So the goal becomes finding a byte or more that can be introduced into the payload before the injection. Unfortunately, \x20 would reveal a bad request error and not allow us to execute the wanted command. However, a new line can be introduced before the GET sequence to bypass the depth restriction. In fact, many new line characters can be used. I tested this out with a simple raw socket python script that looks for return method back. Appropriate line:

import socket
from time import sleep

payload = ("\x0d\x0a"*3)
request = "GET /news.php HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: securityoverride.com\r\n\r\n"

s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
s.connect(("206.214.216.120", 80))
s.send(payload+request)
sleep(1)
reply = s.recv(25)
if (reply.find("200") != -1):
if (raw_input("200 OK found, verify? (y/n):\t") == "y"):
dumpbuff = s.recv(2048) # increase for verification content
print(dumpbuff)
s.close()


The raw bytes coming across (to make sure the byte is actually coming through in our payload):
0d0a 0d0a 0d0a 4745 5420 2f6e :nR.......GET./n

And, validation response:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK (looked through payload, appropriate page seen)

Of course, a simple fuzzer in the payload portion can find characters that can be placed in front of the method to check for allowed characters to use. We could also see what types of encodings are allowed and see if we can expand our usable characters. This way we aren't getting trapped by (byte){x,} type signatures in the future. Speaking of \x20 (space), we can issue this inbetween the http method and the actual URI request.

GET \x20\x20\x20\x20/news.php HTTP/1.1 is as valid as:
GET /news.php HTTP/1.1

*Originally proved using an FTP signature. These are all over.


### within ###

Within is defined in the snort manual as:

"The within keyword is a content modifier that makes sure that at most N bytes are between pattern matches using the content keyword ( See Section 3.5.1 ). It’s designed to be used in conjunction with the distance (Section 3.5.6) rule option."

Please read the depth section for issues with within modifiers. Take note that both depth and within are highly used in snort signatures.



### Takeaway Lessons ###

Remember, more and more signatures are always being written. Despite what you think or what people tell you, more signatures isn't a good thing. More signatures means that Snort and other systems will have a heavier load while processing, parsing, and analyzing packets. PCRE is an expensive operation as well, so verification will be attempted as much as possible before PCRE is done so it doesn't need to load the engine. Given this, ways to optimize will keep coming out and that will include hard-defined pointers to start looking for specific content and even where to stop looking. Mess with the protocol and see what kind of valid bytes you can throw before/after commands/injections, before/after arguments, in the middle of arguments/commands and etc. Simple bypasses are going to want to include mixing cases, including spaces wherever possible, and obviously deviating from the public exploit as much as possible.
The more interesting mutations are going to be created by fuzzing the protocol the attack is on, inserting bytes into the attack call and seeing if the injection still fires. Of course, depending on how the exploit works, you don't have to test with an exploit but valid commands and see if they still fire. I will be going more into this idea on future articles with backing scripts.

Also, not mentioned above, internal attacks are much easier to get passed ids/ips. Because of said optimization, lots of rules are defined as external traffic coming to internal hosts so they don't have to bother with parsing further into ALL traffic to/from a host in your home network. Internal network attacks against applications (layer 7) are not usually defined to even check for such attacks. Most signatures for such services are like:

alert $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET any
$EXTERNAL_NET can also be defined as !$HOME_NET 


Read More Add your Comment 0 comments


Writing Shell Code On/For Windows



Introduction
This article/tutorial assumes you have some common sense and some knowledge.
I won't be explaining what shell code, DLL's, Memory Adresses etc...
You should know that before starting on this.

Environment
Initially we will be focusing on creating Windows Assembly; however, Linux is really
good for developing assembly and shell code. But because we are on windows we'll
use Cygwin.

Download the Cygwin installer from here:
http://www.cygwin.com/setup.exe

During the Cygwin installation you will be asked to select wich packages you wish
to install. The following packages are usefull for creating assembly and shellcode.

* Devel > binutils
* Devel > gcc
* Devel > make
* Devel > nasm
* Devel > gdb
* Editors > hexedit
* Editors > vim
* Net > netcat
* System > util-linux

Tools
Once you have the Cygwin environment setup, download the following tools. Save them within your
Cygwin environment, copy them to something like: C:\cygwin\home\Administrator\shellcode\
(Where Adminstrator is your username)

xxd-shellcode.sh
Parses xxd output to extract raw shellcode
http://www.projectsh...xd-shellcode.sh

shellcode-compiler.sh
Automatically compiles the assembly code, extracts the raw shellcode, creates a Unicode encoded version of the raw shellcode, injects your encoded shellcode into a "Template Exploit" (ms07-004) for testing, creates a C test program containing your shellcode, and then compiles it ready to execute!
http://www.projectsh...de-compiler.zip

arwin.c
Win32 DLL address resolution program
http://www.vividmach...ellcode/arwin.c

shellcodetest.c
http://www.vividmach...shellcodetest.c

findFunctionInDLL.sh
Finds which DLLs on your system contain a specific Windows function
http://www.projectsh...unctionInDLL.sh

Start up a bash shell from the start menu and CD to your 'shellcode directory', such as:

cd /home/Administrator/shellcode

You now need to compile arwin.c by using the following command:

gcc -o arwin arwin.c

You should now be able to run arwin by typing ./arwin to display the usage information.
We don't need to compile shellcodetest.c at this stage. Once we have created our shell code,
then place the shellcode into shellcodetest.c and compile it. This allows us to run shellcodetest
to execute our shellcode.

If you followed along you should now be ready to start developing shell code. 


Read More Add your Comment 0 comments


Password Security Scanner v.1.00



This utility scans the passwords stored by popular Windows applications (Microsoft Outlook, Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, and more...) and displays security information about all these passwords. The security information of every stored password includes the total number of characters, number of numeric characters, number of lowercase/uppercase characters, number of repeating characters, and password strength. You can use this tool to determine whether the passwords used by other users are secured enough, without watching the passwords themselves  


System Requirements
This utility works on any version of Windows, starting from Windows 2000 and up to Windows 7.  


Supported Applications  
Internet Explorer 4.0 - 6.0
Internet Explorer 7.0 - 9.0
Mozilla Firefox (All Versions)
Dialup/VPN passwords of Windows
MSN/Windows Messenger
Microsoft Outlook
Windows Live Mail
Support for more applications will be added in future versions. 


Download: http://www.nirsoft.net


Read More Add your Comment 0 comments


How To Hack Facebook






After watching this video you are now able to build keylogger server with default options for some advance options you can explore various builder functions.

Last Update Date: 10/11/2011 (Curing update.)

Latest Version: v1.78
Project Neptune (1.7 MiB )

Project Neptune includes many features that separate it from other programs and simply make it the best. Each of it,s functions are entirely custom coded and heavily tested.


Read More Add your Comment 7 comments


Free Comodo Internet Security Pro 2012 one year license key



Comodo Internet Security Pro 2012 which is priced at $49.99. This promo will allow users to use the latest pro version completely free for a year.

Free Comodo Internet Security Pro 2012

Comodo Internet Security Pro comes with powerful cloud based Antivirus, Antispyware, and an excellent award winning firewall with defense plus technology that provides high-level of protection. The 2012 consumer products from Comodo is yet to be officially released, but users can start using the new version as the new installers has been already uploaded on the official Comodo servers.


Free Comodo Internet Security Pro 2012 Free

Key Features of Comodo Internet Security Pro 2012:

  • Antivirus, Anti-Spyware, Anti-Rootkit & Bot protection
  • Defends your PC from Internet attacks
  • Detects and eliminates viruses
  • Prevents malware from being installed
  • Auto Sandbox Technology™
  • Easy to install, configure and use
  • Remote Security & System Support
Thanks to Downloadcrew they are currently running a 1 year promo of Comodo Internet Security 2011. The special installer offered by the promo has a built in serial number that can be used in the new 2012 version. Which will require below steps.

Follow below steps to get Free Comodo Internet Security Pro 2012 one year license key

  1. Download Comodo Internet Security Pro 2011 Here -> one-year special installer
  2. Install and start Comodo 2011. Navigate to “More” -> “About” -> Serial Number -> “Copy”.
  3. Save the serial number on your PC, you will need this serial to activate the 2012 version.
  4. Download and Install Free Comodo Internet Security Pro 2012. During installation, enter the serial number that you received from the 2011 version.
Note: The installer will connect to the internet and automatically activate your subscription for 1 year (365 days).


Read More Add your Comment 0 comments


Official GNOME Shell Extensions



Official GNOME Shell Extensions Available In The WebUpd8 GNOME 3 PPA For Ubuntu 11.10

The latest official GNOME Shell Extensions (version 3.2.0) are now available in the WebUpd8 GNOME 3 PPA for Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot. This PPA is an attempt to have all the stable GNOME 3.2 packages that aren't available in the official Ubuntu 11.10 repositories in a single place. Please note that I did not package this. I'm only uploading these packages to a single PPA.

GNOME Shell Extensions is an official GNOME package that provides additional functionality for GNOME Shell, like a classic menu, restore the power-off entry in the user menu, the user theme extension which allows you to easily switch between GNOME Shell themes and more.
 
 

Install GNOME Shell Extensions pack in Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot



Important: an user has reported that using the Alternative Status Menu extension without having a profile picture crashes GNOME Shell. So set a picture (under User Accounts) before installing this extension.


Firstly, add the WebUpd8 GNOME 3 PPA:

sudo add-apt-repository ppa:webupd8team/gnome3
sudo apt-get update


Below you'll find a description on what each extension does and how to install it:



-
Alternative tab extension: use the classic ALT + Tab. Install:

sudo apt-get install gnome-shell-extensions-alternate-tab

- Alternative Status Menu extension
: adds "Power off" and "Hibernate" to the status menu, visible at all time (and not just when pressing the ALT key). Install:
 es/THEME_NAME/gnome-shell or /usr/share/THEME_NAME/gnome-shell. This extension is especially useful when used with GNOME Tweak Tool. This way, you can install and switch between GNOME Shell extensions with a click. Install both User Theme extension and GNOME Tweak Tool:
 
sudo apt-get install gnome-shell-extensions-user-theme gnome-tweak-tool

- Workspace Indicator extension:
displays the current workspace and lets you switch between workspaces (wither using its menu or by scrolling). Install:

sudo apt-get install gnome-shell-extensions-workspace-indicator

- Applications Menu extension:
adds an regular (old-style) menu to the top GNOME Shell bar. Install:

sudo apt-get install gnome-shell-extensions-apps-menu

- Removable Drive Menu extension:
adds a removable drive menu to the top GNOME Shell bar (on the right). Install:

sudo apt-get install gnome-shell-extensions-drive-menu

- SystemMonitor extension:
adds two graphs to the GNOME Shell message tray, displaying the RAM and CPU usage. Install:

sudo apt-get install gnome-shell-extensions-system-monitor

- Places Status Indicator:
adds a menu to the top bar in the old Places Menu style. Install:

sudo apt-get install gnome-shell-extensions-places-menu

- Dock extension: shows a dock-style task switcher

To customize the dock extension, install dconf-tools (sudo apt-get install dconf-tools), then launch "dconf-editor", navigate to org > gnome > shell > extensions > dock and here you can specify the dock position (left or right), enable or disable autohide, specify the hide effect or set the hide duration.

Install:

sudo apt-get install gnome-shell-extensions-dock


- Native Window Placement extension: uses a 'natural' (reflects more the position and size of the actual window) algorithm for displaying the thumbnails in the activities overview. Install:
 
sudo apt-get install gnome-shell-extensions-native-window-placement


- Xrandr Indicator (Monitor Status Indicator) extension: adds a systems status menu for rotating monitors (overrides what is currently provided by gnome-settings-daemon). Install:
 
sudo apt-get install gnome-shell-extensions-xrandr-indicator


- Auto Move Windows extension: this extension can be used to get some applications to always start on a specific workspace Install: 
 
sudo apt-get install gnome-shell-extensions-auto-move-windows


- Gajim extension:
Gajim integration for GNOME Shell. Install:

sudo apt-get install gnome-shell-extensions-gajim


- Windows Navigator extension: Allow keyboard selection of windows and workspaces in overlay mode: when you hold the ALT key, a number is assigned to each window (displayed in the top left corner) and you can then press the number to switch to that window. Install:
 
sudo apt-get install gnome-shell-extensions-windows-navigator

Or, install them all using the following command
(will also install GNOME Tweak Tool) - yeah, there's no meta package yet:

sudo apt-get install gnome-shell-extensions-alternate-tab 
gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu 
gnome-shell-extensions-user-theme 
gnome-tweak-tool 
gnome-shell-extensions-workspace-indicator 
gnome-shell-extensions-apps-menu 
gnome-shell-extensions-drive-menu 
gnome-shell-extensions-system-monitor 
gnome-shell-extensions-places-menu 
gnome-shell-extensions-dock 
gnome-shell-extensions-native-window-placement 
gnome-shell-extensions-gajim 
gnome-shell-extensions-xrandr-indicator 
gnome-shell-extensions-windows-navigator 
gnome-shell-extensions-auto-move-windows


Once installed, reload GNOME Shell (press ALT + F2 and enter "r" or log out and log back in), then use GNOME Tweak Tool to easily enable/disable extensions or switch between GNOME Shell themes on the fly - there's no need to restart GNOME Shell anymore.

 Regards

Adnan Anjum


Read More Add your Comment 0 comments


Bypassing Windows 7 Kernel ASLR



Windows 7 has a nice security about kernel space

Many checks of size, integrity controls and access restrictions are available.For example the “security check” protect our stack if a string is used, many functions like “strcpy()” are deprecated (and some are disallowed) to force developers to have a secure coding.This is why, some attacks were presented as heap overflows in local exploitations (recently Tarjei Mandt)but we don’t see any remote exploitation like we saw in SRV.SYS or other drivers.This lack of remote exploits occurs partially because an ASLR (randomization of memory spaces) is enabled in kernel land. If a hacker doesn’t have any possibilities to jump and execute a payload (ROP, Jmp Eax …) exploitation of the bug isn’t possible. Only a magnificent BSOD could appear in most of the cases.This paper will try to explain how to bypass this protection and improve remote kernel vulnerabilities research!For the use of this document we will consider a remote stack overflow as the main vulnerability

Download PDF


Read More Add your Comment 0 comments


A Code Execution Vulnerability in Google App Engine SDK for Python



Google App Engine is a great technology allowing web developers to develop their own web applications,test them in their internal framework, and deploy them to Google’s appspot.com domain.The Google App Engine framework allows developers to write their web site logic in Python, and offers several frameworks specially created for this. In addition, Google App Engine provides an SDK Console via web that acts as an administration console for the newly written application.This advisory lists 4 different vulnerabilities, one in admin console and three others in the Google python API, which allow a remote attacker to gain full code execution on the developer’s machine. These severe issues have been communicated to Google, and a fix was released last month on Sep 12, 2012 (in version 1.5.4).

Download PDF


Read More Add your Comment 1 comments


WebBackdoors , Attack, Evasion and Detection



This paper provides insight on common web back doors and how simple manipulations could make them undetectable by AV and other security suits. Paper explains few techniques that could be used to render undetectable and unnoticed backdoor inside web applications. This paper is mainly an update for an old paper of ours Effectiveness of Antivirus in Detecting Web Application Backdoors, which mainly questioned the effectiveness of AV with respect to web shells and analysis of a couple of web shells. Current paper takes this topic further and explains a couple of methodologies that could be used to make stealth application layer backdoors using web scripting languages .This paper explains various Web Backdoor attacks and evasion techniques that could be used to stay undetected.

Download PDF  


Read More Add your Comment 0 comments


Advanced SQL Injection - Defcon 17 - john Mccray




According to OWASP top 10 vulnerabilities of 2010, SQL injection is the most dangerous and most common vulnerability around, A SQL Injection vulnerability occurs due to improper input validation or no input validation at all, what I mean by improper or no input validation is the user input is not filtered(for escape characters) before it gets passed to the SQL database, A Sql injection attack can be any many forms, but it's usually categorized into 3 types:

1. Inband
2. Out of band
3. Inferential

n this presentation john Mccray discusses some of advanced SQL Injection methods and topics such as IDS evasion, filter bypassing etc.


Read More Add your Comment 0 comments


BackTrack 5 R1 Released - Penetration Testing Distribution




BackTrack is a Linux-based penetration testing arsenal that aids security professionals in the ability to perform assessments in a purely native environment dedicated to hacking. Regardless if you’re making BackTrack your primary operating system, booting from a LiveDVD, or using your favorite thumbdrive, BackTrack has been customized down to every package, kernel configuration, script and patch solely for the purpose of the penetration tester.

Official BackTrack 5 R1 change log:

  1. This release contains over 120 bug fixes, 30 new tools and 70 tool updates.
  2. The kernel was updated to 2.6.39.4 and includes the relevant injection patches.

According to the guys at OffSec, This release is their best one yet! Some pesky issues such as rfkill in VMWare with rtl8187 issues have been fixed, which provides for a much more solid experience with BackTrack.We’ve have Gnome and KDE ISO images for 32 and 64 bit (no arm this release), as well as a VMWare image of a 32 bit Gnome install, with VMWare Tools pre-installed.
We are mighty excited and are already downloading this release just as we speak!
Download Backtrack 5 R1


Read More Add your Comment 0 comments


Reverse Engineering Hacking Tutorial- Introduction to assembly language



Hello friends, lets continue our tutorial on reverse engineering. Today i will teach you assembly language basic that are necessary for learning reverse engineering. As we all know assembly language is very important for reverse engineering and we must know, what are registers and which register serves for what. How the assembly language instruction work and how can we relate them with normal high language coding( C, JAVA, VB, etc.)  to hack any software. So friends, lets start our reverse engineering hacking class part 2..

reverse engineering, assembly language
Reverse Engineering Hacking Tutorial- Introduction to assembly language

What is Assembly language?
Assembly language is a low level or simply called machine language made up of machine instructions. Assembly language is specific to processor architecture example different for x86 architecture than for SPARC architecture. Assembly language consist of assembly instructions and CPU registers. hackguide4u(Adnan) means I will explain my tutorial considering x86 architecture... Ahhha... From where i start explaining to you ... assembly language is too big topic... I think i have to tell only what you need for reverse engineering.. So i start from CPU registers.

CPU registers - Brief Introduction:
First of all what are registers? Most of Computer Engineering and Electronics Engineering guys knows about them but for others, Registers are small segments of memory inside CPU that are used for storing temporary data. Some registers have specific functions, others are just use for some general data storage. I am considering that you all are using x86 machines. There are two types of processors 32 bit and 64 bit processors. In a 32 bit processor, each register can hold 32 bits of data. On the other hand 64 bit register can hold 64 bit data. I am explaining this tutorial considering that we are using 32 bit processors. I will explain the same for 64 bits in later classes on hackguide4u and hackingloops.
There are several registers but for Reverse engineering we hackguide4u users are only interested in general purpose registers. We are interested in only 9 General purpose registers namely:
EAX
EBX
ECX
EDX
ESI
EDI
ESP
EBP
EIP
All these registers serves for different purposes. So I will start explaining all of them one by one for a more clear and accurate understanding of register concepts. I am putting more strain on these because these registers are called heart of reverse engineering.
EAX register is accumulator register which is used to store results of calculations. If any function returns a value its stored into EAX register. We can access EAX register using functions to retrieve the value of EAX register.
Note: EAX register can also be used for holding normal values regardless of calculations too.


The EDX is the data register. It’s basically an extension of EAX to assist it in storing extra data for complex operations. It can also be used for general purpose data storage.

The ECX, also called the count register, is used for looping operations. The repeated operations could be storing a string or counting numbers.

The ESI and EDI relied upon by loops that process data. The ESI register is the source index for data operation and holds the location of the input data stream. The EDI points to the location where the result of data operation is stored, or the destination index.

ESP is the stack pointer, and EBP is the base pointer. These registers are used for managing function calls and stack operations. When a function is called, the function’s arguments are pushed on the stack and are followed by a return address. The ESP register points to the very top of the stack, so it will point to the return address. EBP is used to point to the bottom of the call stack.

EBX is the only register that was not designed for anything specific. It can be used for extra storage.
EIP is the register that points to the current instruction being executed. As the CPU moves through the binary executing code, EIP is updated to reflect the location where the execution is occurring.
The 'E' at the beginning of each register name stands for Extended. When a register is referred to by its extended name, it indicates that all 32 bits of the register are being addressed.  An interesting thing about registers is that they can be broken down into smaller subsets of themselves; the first sixteen bits of each register can be referenced by simply removing the 'E' from the name. For example, if you wanted to only manipulate the first sixteen bits of the EAX register, you would refer to it as the AX register. Additionally, registers AX through DX can be further broken down into two eight bit parts. So, if you wanted to manipulate only the first eight bits (bits 0-7) of the AX register, you would refer to the register as AL; if you wanted to manipulate the last eight bits (bits 8-15) of the AX register, you would refer to the register as AH ('L' standing for Low and 'H' standing for High).
Introduction to Memory and Stacks:
There are three main sections of memory:

1. Stack Section - Where the stack is located, stores local variables and function arguments.

2. Data Section - Where the heap is located, stores static and dynamic variables.

3. Code Section - Where the actual program instructions are located.

The stack section starts at the high memory addresses and grows downwards, towards the lower memory addresses; conversely, the data section (heap) starts at the lower memory addresses and grows upwards, towards the high memory addresses. Therefore, the stack and the heap grow towards each other as more variables are placed in each of those sections. I have shown that in below Figure..
High Memory Addresses (0xFFFFFFFF)
---------------------- <-----Bottom of the stack

|                          |

|                          |   |

|         Stack        |   | Stack grows down

|                          |   v

|                          |

|---------------------| <----Top of the stack (ESP points here)

|                          |

|                          |

|                          |

|                          |

|                          |

|---------------------|  <----Top of the heap

|                          |

|                          |    ^

|       Heap          |     |   Heap grows up

|                          |    |

|                          |

|---------------------| <-----Bottom of the heap

|                          |

|    Instructions    |

|                          |

|                          |

-----------------------

Low Memory Addresses (0x00000000)
 
 Some Essential Assembly Instructions for Reverse Engineering:

Instruction Example          Description
push     push eax Pushes the value stored in EAX onto the stack
pop pop eax Pops a value off of the stack and stores it in EAX
call call 0x08abcdef Calls a function located at 0x08abcdef
mov mov eax,0x5 Moves the value of 5 into the EAX register
sub sub eax,0x4 Subtracts 4 from the value in the EAX register
add add eax,0x1 Adds 1 to the value in the EAX register
inc inc eax Increases the value stored in EAX by one
dec dec eax Decreases the value stored in EAX by one
cmp cmp eax,edx Compare values in EAX and EDX; if equal set the zero flag* to 1
test test eax,edx Performs an AND operation on the values in EAX and EDX; if the result is zero, sets the zero flag to 1
jmp jmp 0x08abcde Jump to the instruction located at 0x08abcde
jnz jnz 0x08ffff01 Jump if the zero flag is set to 1
jne jne 0x08ffff01 Jump to 0x08ffff01 if a comparison is not equal
and and eax,ebx Performs a bit wise AND operation on the values stored in EAX and EBX; the result is saved in EAX
or or eax,ebx Performs a bit wise OR operation on the values stored in EAX and EBX; the result is saved in EAX
xor xor eax,eax Performs a bit wise XOR operation on the values stored in EAX and EBX; the result is saved in EAX
leave leave Remove data from the stack before returning
ret ret Return to a parent function
nop nop No operation (a 'do nothing' instruction)

*The zero flag (ZF) is a 1 bit indicator which records the result of a cmp or test instruction

Each instruction performs one specific task, and can deal directly with registers, memory addresses, and the contents thereof. It is easiest to understand exactly what these functions are used for when seen in the context of a simple hello world program and try to relate assembly language with high level language such as C language.
Here is simple C program that displays Hello World:
int main(int argc, char *argv[])                    {                     printf("Hello World!\n");                 return 0;           }    

Save this program as helloworld.c and compile it with 'gcc -o helloworld helloworld.c'; run the resulting binary and it should print "Hello World!" on the screen and exit. Ahhah... It looks quite simple. Now let's look how it will look in assembly language.

0x8048384     push ebp                      <--- Save the EBP value on the stack
0x8048385     mov ebp,esp               <--- Create a new EBP value for this function
0x8048387     sub esp,0x8                 <---Allocate 8 bytes on the stack for local variables
0x804838a     and esp,0xfffffff0          <---Clear the last byte of the ESP register
0x804838d     mov eax,0x0                 <---Place a zero in the EAX register
0x8048392     sub esp,eax                  <---Subtract EAX (0) from the value in ESP
0x8048394     mov DWORD PTR [esp],0x80484c4     <---Place our argument for the printf() (at address 0x08048384) onto the stack
0x804839b     call 0x80482b0 <_init+56>                     <---Call printf()
0x80483a0     mov eax,0x0                 <---Put our return value (0) into EAX
0x80483a5     leave                              <---Clean up the local variables and restore the EBP value
0x80483a6     ret                                  <---Pop the saved EIP value back into the EIP register
As you can easily figure out these instructions are similar to that of C program. You can easily note that flow of program is same. Off course it will be same as its a assembly code of same binary (exe) obtained from executing above C program.
 
I hope you all like it. We will continue our discussion tomorrow where i will explain how to analyze assembly language codes for those binaries whose high level source code we don't have.
A quick tip for all users how to learn assembly language better...  Pick a already made code and generate its binary or exe file and now obtains the assembly code of that binary and try to relate assembly code with high language code. I guarantee that will surely help you to understand better as I always used to do understand things like these ways only.


Read More Add your Comment 2 comments


 

© 2011 Learn Cyber Security All Rights Reserved Learn Hacking Online hackguide4u.com